In-Depth Journalism: A Thing of the Past?

Think back to the last time you read, saw or listened to a well-put together, thoroughly researched news report.

If you're scratching your head trying to come up with something, you're not alone.

Media experts speaking at a hearing held by the Federal Communications Commission at Arizona State University earlier this week said new media organizations are coming anywhere close to filling gaps created by traditional media outlets that have had to let go of journalists.

So what does that mean? 

"Real news has too often been replaced by fluff, and democracy is not well served by fluff," Commission member Michael Copps said.

A report on the matter said "daily newspapers have decreased their staffing levels by more than 25 percent since 2001 and that the shortage of local reporting means that scandals aren't exposed, public dangers aren't identified and local political candidates aren't vetted as they once were," according to the Associated Press.

It's not a new complaint as veteran reporters are replaced with less experienced reporters for lower pay and even the ones left behind have less time to work on an in-depth piece before it has to be cranked out to be posted on the Internet to keep up with other competitors.

Proposed solutions include more partnership among news competitors and nonprofit news organizations to fill in the gap. The report also suggested creating public affairs cable channels similar to C-SPAN at the state level, easing tax rules for nonprofit news organizations and directing more federal advertising spending to local news media, AP said.